Learn · Strategy · Beginner

How to check a content plan against Google’s helpful content questions

Use the questions Google publishes about people-first content to test each planned page before you commission it, and write down the reason it exists.

By Dean Cruddace · 60 minutes to do · Updated · Last reviewed

What Google’s helpful content questions are

A content plan is a list of pages you intend to publish. Google publishes a set of questions for judging whether content is helpful and reliable, and calls the goal people-first content: content created primarily for people, not to manipulate search rankings.

The questions are written for content that already exists, but they work as a checklist for a plan, before money and time are spent. This guide shows how to apply them page by page and keep a written record of your answers.

Why a content plan needs testing

Google says its automated ranking systems are designed to prioritise helpful, reliable information created to benefit people, not content created to manipulate rankings. Its page lists warning signs of content made mainly for search engines, such as producing lots of content on many topics in the hope some of it performs. See Creating helpful, reliable, people-first content.

What you need to check a content plan against Google's helpful content questions

  • Your current content plan or list of topics
  • A spreadsheet or document with one row per planned page
  • The name of whoever will write or review each page
  • Someone not connected to your site who can give an honest view

Check a content plan against Google's helpful content questions, step by step

  1. 1

    List each planned page with its audience

    Put each planned page on its own row. Next to it, name the audience. Google asks: do you have an existing or intended audience that would find the content useful if they came directly to you?

    You will know it worked when Every row has a named audience. Rows where you cannot name one are marked.

  2. 2

    Answer the people-first questions

    For each row, answer Google's questions: does the content clearly show first-hand expertise and depth of knowledge, does your site have a primary purpose or focus, and will a reader leave feeling they have learned enough to achieve their goal? Google says answering yes probably means you are on the right track. See the full list.

    You will know it worked when Each row has a yes or no against each question, with a short note for every no.

  3. 3

    Look for the warning signs

    Google lists questions where a yes is a warning sign: Is the content primarily made to attract visits from search engines? Are you writing about something only because it seems to be trending? Are you mainly summarising what others say? Are you writing to a word count? On the last one, Google says it has no preferred word count.

    You will know it worked when Rows or patterns that trigger a warning sign are flagged for rethinking.

  4. 4

    Write the Who and the How

    Who: Google asks whether it is clear who created the content, whether pages carry a byline where one might be expected, and whether the byline leads to information about the author. It says to avoid deceptive authorship, such as made-up names or false credentials. How: if automation or AI will be used, Google asks whether that is evident to visitors and whether you explain how and why it was used.

    You will know it worked when Each row names the real author or reviewer and says whether and how automation will be used and disclosed.

  5. 5

    Write the Why

    Google calls Why perhaps the most important question: why is the content being created? The aligned answer is to help people, with content useful to visitors who come to your site directly. If the answer is mainly to attract search visits, Google says that is not what its systems seek to reward. Write the answer in one sentence per row.

    You will know it worked when Every row has a one-sentence reason that does not depend on search visits.

  6. 6

    Test what each page adds

    Search for the topic yourself and read what already ranks. Google asks whether your page will provide original information, reporting, research or analysis, avoid simply copying or rewriting other sources, and offer substantial value compared with other pages in search results.

    You will know it worked when Each row states, in a sentence, what is new or better about the planned page.

  7. 7

    Check any plan to use AI or automation

    Google says generative AI can be useful for researching a topic and adding structure to original content, but generating many pages without adding value may violate its spam policy on scaled content abuse. It also says to fact-check and review AI-generated content before publishing, including titles, descriptions and image alt text. See its generative AI guidance.

    You will know it worked when Any row using automation has a named human who fact-checks it before publication.

  8. 8

    Ask an outsider and decide

    Google suggests asking people you trust who are unaffiliated with your site for an honest assessment. Show them the plan and the Why sentences. Then keep, rework or drop each row.

    You will know it worked when Every row is marked keep, rework or drop, with your reason recorded.

Common mistakes when you check a content plan against Google's helpful content questions

  • Choosing topics only because they are trending. Google lists this as a warning sign.
  • Writing to a target word count. Google says it does not have a preferred one.
  • Using AI to produce many pages without adding value. Google says this may violate its scaled content abuse policy.
  • Inventing author names or credentials. Google calls fabricated creator profiles a form of deception.
  • Treating these questions as a ranking score. They are a self-assessment, and Google says E-E-A-T is not itself a specific ranking factor.

Terms used when you check a content plan against Google's helpful content questions

People-first content
Content created primarily to help people, rather than to gain search engine rankings.
E-E-A-T
Experience, expertise, authoritativeness and trustworthiness: qualities Google's systems look for signals of. Google says it is not a specific ranking factor.
Scaled content abuse
In Google's spam policies, many pages generated mainly to manipulate rankings and not to help users, no matter how they are created.
Byline
The line naming who wrote a piece of content, ideally linking to information about them.
A content plan you want tested before you commit to it?

Share the plan and what it is meant to achieve. You will get a reply from Dean, not a sales sequence.

Talk to an SEO specialistSEO strategy: plan the content →