Where it breaks

Every ranking problem starts somewhere on this path.

Tools report symptoms. The work is finding which step is failing, and why.

Discover

Internal links, sitemaps, orphan pages

Crawl

Robots.txt, status codes, crawl budget, logs

Render

JavaScript, lazy loading, blocked resources

Index

Canonicals, duplicates, hreflang, parameters

Understand

Structured data, entities, architecture

Implementation

An audit is an investigation. The fix is a deliverable.

A tool export is not an audit. We read the site, form a hypothesis, test it, then write findings your developers can act on, in order of impact. If they have no capacity, we can make the changes.

Developer collaboration

Tickets with the fault, the evidence, the fix and the acceptance test.

Direct implementation

Templates, redirects, structured data and tooling built by us where that’s faster.

SEO QA

Releases checked before and after launch, so regressions are caught early.

Questions

Technical SEO, answered.

Is Core Web Vitals the main thing?

No. Performance matters, but it is one input. Most serious technical problems sit in crawling, indexing, rendering and architecture.

Can you work with our developers?

Yes, that is the usual set-up. We write findings as specifications they can build and test, and stay involved through QA.

Do you handle migrations?

Yes: planning, redirect mapping, testing, launch monitoring and recovery, for single sites and multi-market structures.

What do we get at the end of an audit?

A prioritised set of findings with evidence and fixes, and a plan for what is done first. Not a tool export.

Bring us the site nobody can explain.

Tell us what’s happening, what has been tried and what the platform is. We’ll say how we would investigate it.